Article
Full entry |
PDF
(0.3 MB)
Feedback
PDF
(0.3 MB)
Feedback
Keywords:
analytic $P$-ideals; cardinal invariants; forcing
analytic $P$-ideals; cardinal invariants; forcing
Summary:
Given an ideal $\mathcal I$ on $\omega $ let $\mathfrak{a} (\mathcal I)$ ($\bar{\mathfrak{a}}(\mathcal I)$) be minimum of the cardinalities of infinite (uncountable) maximal $\mathcal I$-almost disjoint subsets of $[{\omega}]^{\omega}$. We show that $\mathfrak{a} (\mathcal I_h)>{\omega}$ if $\mathcal I_h$ is a summable ideal; but $\mathfrak{a} ({\mathcal Z_{\vec \mu }})= {\omega}$ for any tall density ideal $\mathcal Z_{\vec \mu }$ including the density zero ideal $\mathcal Z$. On the other hand, you have $\mathfrak{b}\le \bar{\mathfrak{a}}(\mathcal I)$ for any analytic $P$-ideal $\mathcal I$, and $\bar{\mathfrak{a}}(\mathcal Z_{\vec \mu })\le \mathfrak{a}$ for each density ideal $\mathcal Z_{\vec \mu }$. For each ideal $\mathcal I$ on $\omega $ denote $\mathfrak{b}_{\mathcal I}$ and $\mathfrak{d}_{\mathcal I}$ the unbounding and dominating numbers of $\langle \omega ^\omega , \le_{\mathcal I}\rangle $ where $f\le_{\mathcal I} g$ iff $\{n\in \omega :f(n)> g(n)\}\in \mathcal I$. We show that $\mathfrak{b}_{\mathcal I}= \mathfrak{b}$ and $\mathfrak{d}_{\mathcal I}= \mathfrak{d}$ for each analytic $P$-ideal $\mathcal I$. Given a Borel ideal $\mathcal I$ on $\omega $ we say that a poset $\mathbb P$ is {\em $\mathcal I$-bounding\/} iff $\forall\, x\in \mathcal I\cap V^{\mathbb P}$ $\exists\, y\in \mathcal I\cap V$ $x\subseteq y$. $\mathbb P$ is {\em $\mathcal I$-dominating\/} iff $\exists\, y\in \mathcal I\cap V^{\mathbb P}$ $\forall\, x\in \mathcal I\cap V$ $x\subseteq^* y$. For each analytic $P$-ideal $\mathcal I$ if a poset $\mathbb P$ has the Sacks property then $\mathbb P$ is $\mathcal I$-bounding; moreover if $\mathcal I$ is tall as well then the property $\mathcal I$-bounding/$\mathcal I$-dominating implies ${\omega}^{\omega}$-bounding/adding dominating reals, and the converses of these two implications are false. For the density zero ideal $\mathcal Z$ we can prove more: (i) a poset $\mathbb P$ is $\mathcal Z$-bounding iff it has the Sacks property, (ii) if $\mathbb P$ adds a slalom capturing all ground model reals then $\mathbb P$ is $\mathcal Z$-dominating.
References:
[Fa] Farah I.: Analytic quotients: theory of liftings for quotients over analytic ideals on the integers. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 148 (2000), no. 702, 177 pp. MR 1711328 | Zbl 0966.03045
[Fr] Fremlin D.H.: Measure Theory. Set-theoretic Measure Theory. Torres Fremlin, Colchester, England, 2004; available at {\tt http://www.essex.ac.uk/maths/staff/fremlin/mt.html}
[Ku] Kunen K.: Set Theory, An Introduction to Independence Proofs. North Holland, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, 1980. MR 0597342 | Zbl 0534.03026
[LaZh] Laflamme C., Zhu J.-P.: The Rudin-Blass ordering of ultrafilters. J. Symbolic Logic 63 (1998), no. 2, 584--592. DOI 10.2307/2586852 | MR 1627310 | Zbl 0911.04001
[LoVe] Louveau A., Veličković B.: Analytic ideals and cofinal types. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 99 (1999), 171--195. DOI 10.1016/S0168-0072(98)00065-7 | MR 1708151
[Ru] Rudin M.E.: Partial orders on the types of $\beta \omega $. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 155 (1971), 353--362. MR 0273581
[So] Solecki S.: Analytic $P$-ideals and their applications. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 99 (1999), 51--72. DOI 10.1016/S0168-0072(98)00051-7 | MR 1708146
[Vo] Vojtáš P.: Generalized Galois-Tukey-connections between explicit relations on classical objects of real analysis. Set Theory of the Reals (Ramat Gan, 1991), Israel Math. Conf. Proc., 6, Bar-Ilan Univ., Ramat Gan, 1993, pp. 619--643. MR 1234291
Search
Partner of
