Previous |  Up |  Next

Article

Title: A second-order stochastic dominance portfolio efficiency measure (English)
Author: Kopa, Miloš
Author: Chovanec, Petr
Language: English
Journal: Kybernetika
ISSN: 0023-5954
Volume: 44
Issue: 2
Year: 2008
Pages: 243-258
Summary lang: English
.
Category: math
.
Summary: In this paper, we introduce a new linear programming second-order stochastic dominance (SSD) portfolio efficiency test for portfolios with scenario approach for distribution of outcomes and a new SSD portfolio inefficiency measure. The test utilizes the relationship between CVaR and dual second-order stochastic dominance, and contrary to tests in Post [Post] and Kuosmanen [Kuosmanen], our test detects a dominating portfolio which is SSD efficient. We derive also a necessary condition for SSD efficiency using convexity property of CVaR to speed up the computation. The efficiency measure represents a distance between the tested portfolio and its least risky dominating SSD efficient portfolio. We show that this measure is consistent with the second-order stochastic dominance relation. We find out that this measure is convex and we use this result to describe the set of SSD efficient portfolios. Finally, we illustrate our results on a numerical example. (English)
Keyword: stochastic dominance
Keyword: CVaR
Keyword: SSD portfolio efficiency measure
MSC: 60E15
MSC: 90C25
MSC: 91B28
MSC: 91B30
idZBL: Zbl 1154.91456
idMR: MR2428222
.
Date available: 2009-09-24T20:33:49Z
Last updated: 2012-06-06
Stable URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10338.dmlcz/135846
.
Reference: [1] Giorgi E. De: Reward-risk portfolio selection and stochastic dominance.J. Banking Finance 29 (2005), 895–926
Reference: [2] Giorgi E. De, Post T.: Second order stochastic dominance, reward-risk portfolio selection and the CAPM.J. Financial Quantitative Analysis, to appear
Reference: [3] Dybvig P. H., Ross S. A.: Portfolio efficient sets.Econometrica 50 (1982), 6, 1525–1546 Zbl 0495.90010, MR 0685335
Reference: [4] Hadar J., Russell W. R.: Rules for ordering uncertain prospects.Amer. Econom. Rev. 59 (1969), 1, 25–34
Reference: [5] Hanoch G., Levy H.: The efficiency analysis of choices involving risk.Rev. Econom. Stud. 36 (1969), 335–346 Zbl 0184.45202
Reference: [6] Kopa M., Post T.: A portfolio optimality test based on the first-order stochastic dominance criterion.J. Financial Quantitative Analysis, to appear
Reference: [7] Kuosmanen T.: Efficient diversification according to stochastic dominance criteria.Management Sci. 50 (2004), 10, 1390–1406
Reference: [8] Levy H.: Stochastic dominance and expected utility: Survey and analysis.Management Sci. 38 (1992), 4, 555–593 Zbl 0764.90004
Reference: [9] Levy H.: Stochastic Dominance: Investment Decision Making Under Uncertainty.Second edition. Springer Science, New York 2006 Zbl 1109.91037, MR 2239375
Reference: [10] Markowitz H. M.: Portfolio Selection.J. Finance 7 (1952), 1, 77–91
Reference: [11] Markowitz H. M.: Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification in Investments.Wiley, New York 1959 MR 0103768
Reference: [12] Ogryczak W., Ruszczyński A.: Dual stochastic dominance and related mean-risk models.SIAM J. Optim. 13 (2002), 60–78 Zbl 1022.91017, MR 1922754
Reference: [13] Pflug G. Ch.: Some remarks on the value-at-risk and the conditional value-at-risk.In: Probabilistic Constrained Optimization: Methodology and Applications (S. Uryasev, ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell MA 2000, pp. 278–287 Zbl 0994.91031, MR 1819417
Reference: [14] Post T.: Empirical tests for stochastic dominance efficiency.J. Finance 58 (2003), 1905–1932
Reference: [15] Rothschild M., Stiglitz J. E.: Rules for ordering uncertain prospects.J. Econom. Theory 2 (1969), 225–243
Reference: [16] Russell W. R., Seo T. K.: Representative sets for stochastic dominance rules.In: Studies in the Economics of Uncertainty (T. B. Fomby and T. K. Seo, eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York 1989, pp. 59–76
Reference: [17] Ruszczyński A., Vanderbei R. J.: Frontiers of stochastically nondominated portfolios.Econometrica 71 (2003), 4, 1287–1297 Zbl 1154.91475, MR 1995832
Reference: [18] Uryasev S., Rockafellar R. T.: Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions.J. Banking Finance 26 (2002), 1443–1471
Reference: [19] Whitmore G. A.: Third degree stochastic dominance.Amer. Econom. Rev. 60 (1970), 457–459
.

Files

Files Size Format View
Kybernetika_44-2008-2_8.pdf 966.1Kb application/pdf View/Open
Back to standard record
Partner of
EuDML logo