Previous |  Up |  Next

Article

Title: Poset-valued preference relations (English)
Author: Janiš, Vladimír
Author: Montes, Susana
Author: Šešelja, Branimir
Author: Tepavčević, Andreja
Language: English
Journal: Kybernetika
ISSN: 0023-5954 (print)
ISSN: 1805-949X (online)
Volume: 51
Issue: 5
Year: 2015
Pages: 747-764
Summary lang: English
.
Category: math
.
Summary: In decision processes some objects may not be comparable with respect to a preference relation, especially if several criteria are considered. To provide a model for such cases a poset valued preference relation is introduced as a fuzzy relation on a set of alternatives with membership values in a partially ordered set. We analyze its properties and prove the representation theorem in terms of particular order reversing involution on the co-domain poset. We prove that for every set of alternatives there is a poset valued preference whose cut relations are all relations on this domain. We also deal with particular transitivity of such preferences. (English)
Keyword: relation
Keyword: poset
Keyword: order reversing involutions
Keyword: weakly orthogonal poset
Keyword: transitivity
MSC: 03G10
MSC: 91B08
idZBL: Zbl 06537778
idMR: MR3445982
DOI: 10.14736/kyb-2015-5-0747
.
Date available: 2015-12-16T18:56:36Z
Last updated: 2018-01-10
Stable URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10338.dmlcz/144741
.
Reference: [1] Bezdek, J., Spillman, B., Spillman, R.: A fuzzy relation space for group decision theory..Fuzzy Sets Systems 1 (1978), 255-268. Zbl 0398.90009, MR 0508976, 10.1016/0165-0114(78)90017-9
Reference: [2] Birkhoff, G.: Lattice Theory. (Third edition..AMS Colloquium Publications, Vol. XXV, 1967. MR 0227053
Reference: [3] Chajda, I.: An algebraic axiomatization of orthogonal posets..Soft Computing 18 (2013), 1, 1-4). 10.1007/s00500-013-1047-1
Reference: [4] Cignoli, R., Esteva, F.: Commutative, integral bounded residuated lattices with an added involution..Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (2009), 2, 150-160. Zbl 1181.03061, MR 2552735, 10.1016/j.apal.2009.05.008
Reference: [5] Dasgupta, M., Deb, R.: Fuzzy choice functions..Soc. Choice Welfare 8 (1991), 2, 171-182. Zbl 0717.90004, MR 1115895, 10.1007/bf00187373
Reference: [6] David, H.: The Method of Paired Comparisons..Griffin's Statistical Monographs and Courses, Vol. 12, Charles Griffin and D. Ltd., 1963. Zbl 0665.62075, MR 0174105
Reference: [7] Baets, B. De, Meyer, H. De: Transitivity frameworks for reciprocal relations: cycle-transitivity versus FG-transitivity..Fuzzy Sets and Systems 152 (2005), 2, 249-270. Zbl 1114.91031, MR 2138509
Reference: [8] Baets, B. De, Meyer, H. De, Schuymer, B. De: Cyclic Evaluation of Transitivity of Reciprocal Relations..Social Choice and Welfare 26 (2006), 217-238. Zbl 1158.91338, MR 2226508, 10.1016/j.fss.2004.11.002
Reference: [9] Doignon, J.-P., Monjardet, B., Roubens, M., Vincke, Ph.: Biorder families, valued relations, and preference modelling..J. Math. Psych. 30 (1986), 435-480. Zbl 0612.92020, MR 0868774, 10.1016/0022-2496(86)90020-9
Reference: [10] Dutta, B., Laslier, J.F.: Comparison functions and choice correspondences..Soc. Choice Welfare 16 (1999), 513-532. Zbl 1066.91535, MR 1713186, 10.1007/s003550050158
Reference: [11] Fan, Z.-P., X, X. Chen: Consensus measures and adjusting inconsistency of linguistic preference relations in group decision making..Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag 3613 (2005), 130-139. 10.1007/11539506_16
Reference: [12] Fan, Z.-P., Jiang, Y. P.: A judgment method for the satisfying consistency of linguistic judgment matrix..Control and Decision 19 (2004), 903-906.
Reference: [13] Fishburn, P. C.: Binary choice probabilities: on the varieties of stochastic transitivity..J. Math. Psychology 10 (1973), 327-352. Zbl 0277.92008, MR 0327330, 10.1016/0022-2496(73)90021-7
Reference: [14] Flachsmeyer, J.: Note on orthocomplemented posets II..In: Proc. 10th Winter School on Abstract Analysis (Z. Frolík, ed.), Circolo Matematico di Palermo, Palermo 1982. pp. 67-74. Zbl 0535.06003, MR 0683769
Reference: [15] Fodor, J., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support..Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994. Zbl 0827.90002, 10.1007/978-94-017-1648-2
Reference: [16] García-Lapresta, J., Llamazares, B.: Aggregation of fuzzy preferences: some rules of the mean..Soc. Choice Welfare 17 (2000), 673-690. Zbl 1069.91518, MR 1778698, 10.1007/s003550000048
Reference: [17] García-Lapresta, J., Llamazares, B.: Majority decisions based on difference of votes..J. Math. Economics 35 (2001), 463-481. Zbl 0987.91022, MR 1838607, 10.1016/s0304-4068(01)00055-6
Reference: [18] Goguen, J. A.: $L$-fuzzy sets..J. Math. Anal. Appl. 18 (1967), 145-174. Zbl 0145.24404, MR 0224391, 10.1016/0022-247x(67)90189-8
Reference: [19] Herrera, F.: A sequential selection process in group decision making with linguistic assessment..Inform. Sci. 85 (1995), 223-239. 10.1016/0020-0255(95)00025-k
Reference: [20] Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information..Fuzzy Sets and Systems 115 (2000), 67-82. Zbl 1073.91528, MR 1776304, 10.1016/s0165-0114(99)00024-x
Reference: [21] Herrera, F., Martínez, L.: A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words..IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 8 (2000), 746-752. MR 1784646, 10.1109/91.890332
Reference: [22] Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Mart{í}nez, L.: A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic terms sets in decision making..Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114 (2000), 43-58. MR 1776304, 10.1016/s0165-0114(98)00093-1
Reference: [23] Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J. L.: A Model of Consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments..Fuzzy Sets and Systems 78 (1996), 73-87. MR 1376216, 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00107-7
Reference: [24] Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J. L.: Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators..Fuzzy Sets and Systems 79 (1996), 175-190. Zbl 0870.90007, MR 1388390, 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00162-x
Reference: [25] Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F.: A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures..IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics 32 (2002), 394-402. 10.1109/tsmca.2002.802821
Reference: [26] Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M., Nurmi, H.: Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority..Fuzzy Sets and Systems 49 (1992), 21-31. Zbl 0768.90003, MR 1177944, 10.1016/0165-0114(92)90107-f
Reference: [27] Kacprzyk, J., Nurmi, H., (eds.), M. Fedrizzi: Consensus under Fuzziness..Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 1996. Zbl 0882.00024
Reference: [28] Klement, E. P., Mesiar, R., Pap, E.: Triangular Norms..Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston - London - Dordrecht 2000. Zbl 1087.20041, MR 1790096, 10.1007/978-94-015-9540-7
Reference: [29] Lahiri, S.: Axiomatic characterizations of threshold choice functions for comparison functions..Fuzzy Sets and Systems 132 (2002), 77-82. Zbl 1042.91016, MR 1936216, 10.1016/s0165-0114(01)00240-8
Reference: [30] Menger, K.: Probabilistic theories of relations..Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (Math.) 37 (1951), 178-180. Zbl 0042.37103, MR 0042080, 10.1073/pnas.37.3.178
Reference: [31] Monjardet, B.: A generalisation of probabilistic consistency: linearity conditions for valued preference relations..In: Non-conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making (J. Kacprzyk and M. Roubens, eds.), Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 301, Springer-Verlag, 1988. MR 1133647, 10.1007/978-3-642-51711-2_3
Reference: [32] Nurmi, H.: Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations..Fuzzy Sets Systems 6 (1981), 249-259. Zbl 0465.90006, MR 0635346, 10.1016/0165-0114(81)90003-8
Reference: [33] Nurmi, H.: Comparing Voting Systems..Reidel, Dordrecht 1987. 10.1007/978-94-009-3985-1
Reference: [34] Ovchinnikov, S.: Similarity relations, fuzzy partitions, and fuzzy orderings..Fuzzy Sets and Systems 40 (1991), 1, 107-126. Zbl 0725.04003, MR 1103658, 10.1016/0165-0114(91)90048-u
Reference: [35] Pták, P., Pulmannová, P.: Orthomodular Structures as Quantum Logics..Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1991. Zbl 0743.03039, MR 1176314
Reference: [36] Roberts, F.: Homogeneous families of semiorders and the theory of probabilistic consistency..J. Math. Psych. 8 (1971), 248-263. Zbl 0223.92017, MR 0292534, 10.1016/0022-2496(71)90016-2
Reference: [37] Roubens, M., Vincke, Ph.: Preference Modelling..Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1985. Zbl 0612.92020, MR 0809182, 10.1007/978-3-642-46550-5
Reference: [38] Šešelja, B., Tepavčević, A.: On a construction of codes by $P$-fuzzy sets..Review of Research, Fac. of Sci., Univ. of Novi Sad, Math. Ser. 20 2 (1990), 71-80. Zbl 0749.94027, MR 1158427
Reference: [39] Šešelja, B., Tepavčević, A.: Partially ordered and relational valued fuzzy relations I..Fuzzy Sets and Systems 72 (1995), 2, 205-213. Zbl 0844.04008, MR 1335535, 10.1016/0165-0114(94)00352-8
Reference: [40] Šešelja, B., Tepavčević, A.: Completion of ordered structures by cuts of fuzzy sets. An overview..Fuzzy Sets and Systems 136 (2003), 1-19. Zbl 1020.06005, MR 1978466, 10.1016/s0165-0114(02)00365-2
Reference: [41] Šeselja, B., Tepavčević, A.: Representing ordered structures by fuzzy sets. An overview..Fuzzy Sets and Systems 136 (2003), 21-39. Zbl 1026.03039, MR 1978467, 10.1016/s0165-0114(02)00366-4
Reference: [42] Switalski, Z.: Rationality of fuzzy reciprocal preference relations..Fuzzy Sets and Systems 107 (1999), 187-190. Zbl 0938.91019, MR 1702851, 10.1016/s0165-0114(97)00313-8
Reference: [43] Yager, R. R.: An approach to ordinal decision making..Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 12 (1995), 237-261. Zbl 0870.68137, MR 1327857, 10.1016/0888-613x(94)00035-2
Reference: [44] Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy sets..Information and Control 8 (1965), 338-353. Zbl 0942.00007, MR 0219427, 10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x
.

Files

Files Size Format View
Kybernetika_51-2015-5_3.pdf 403.1Kb application/pdf View/Open
Back to standard record
Partner of
EuDML logo